Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01909
Original file (PD 2014 01909.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-01909
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Air Force     BOARD DATE: 20140916
SEPARATION DATE: 20020102


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SRA/E-4 (39031/Security Police) medically separated for a left leg (S1 radiculopathy) condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards and he was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The left leg condition, characterized as “post-surgical S1 nerve root impingement causing radiculopathy with weakness in left leg and foot” by the MEB, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “left S1 radiculopathy secondary to L5-S1 disk herniation status post left L5 hemilaminotomy and L5-S1 microdiskectomy” as unfitting, rated at 10% citing Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) guidelines. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please review all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left leg radiculopathy condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20011002
 VA - (~10 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left S1 Radiculopathy… 5293 10% Post Surgical S1 Nerve Root Impingement w/Radiculopathy with Weakness of Left Leg and Foot *5293-8520 20% 20021023
Post Surgical S1 Nerve Root Impingement with Painful and Limited Motion *5293-5292 20% 20021023
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 21107 (most proximate to date of separation )
*Condition initially adjudicated VASRD code 5293 “Post-Surgical S1 Nerve Root Impingement w/Radiculopathy with Weakness of Left Leg and Foot” at 20% effective 20020103, then changed to above, 40% combined, effective 20020923.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate service members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12 month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.

Left S1 Radiculopathy Condition. Service treatment records document that the CI, ruptured his (L5-S1) a lumbosacral disc in August 2000, while deployed to Kuwait. His injury did not improve with conservative treatment; there was a loss of motor reflex and sensation in the left lower extremity. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study showed a large posterior left paracentral lumbosacral disc herniation. He was referred to neurosurgery consultation and underwent surgery to decompress the nerve and disc removal (L5 hemilaminectomy and L5-S1 microdiscectomy) in January 2001. An MRI dated 28 March 2001, suggested postoperative scarring and mild degenerative changes. He continued to have back pain and developed weakness, numbness and shooting pain from the left buttock to the left leg and foot without any significant improvement. He issued a L4 permanent profile and was referred for MEB.

The narrative summary dated 25 April 2001 (performed 8 months prior to separation), noted that the CI had left leg nerve pain (radiculopathy) that was constant and was worsened by physical activity such as bending, lifting and running. He had decreased sensation and strength in the back of the left leg, outer left ankle and foot (the sacral nerve 1 distribution and innervation region). He used Vicodin one to two tablets every 4 to 6 hours as needed for pain control and declined recommended additional surgical procedure. The pain interfered with his ability to perform his duties as a security police officer. During the physical examination, the examiner revealed that CI sat tilted to the right because pressure on left buttocks caused increased left leg pain. There was mild pain over a healed scar in the center of the lower back, but no muscle spasm. Straight leg raise test (for nerve involvement) on the left was grossly positive. There was decreased sensation over the left lateral foot, 4/5 strength with dorsiflexion on the left and 1+ Achilles reflex on the left. An MRI of lumbar spine dated 19 November 2001 demonstrated no focal nerve root impingement or spinal stenosis evident.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination (performed 10 months after separation), the CI reported daily low back weakness with pain rated four on a scale of 1/10; he pain was as severe as before the surgery. He reported flare-ups twice a week with pain level of 9/10, with duration of a half hour to an hour. Prolonged standing, walking and sitting increased the pain which was relieved by stopping the activity. He rarely used a cane. The CI also reported a lack of endurance. He felt his functional activities were 5% to 10% impaired because of his back pain had the greatest impact at the beginning and end of day. The CI also reported the feeling of pins and needles in the left foot. His walking was limited, he couldn’t exercise, couldn’t do ladder work but could perform limited home maintenance. He reported his left knee had gone out on several occasions, as recently as the previous day. He reported difficulty getting a job due to his back injury. The VA C&P physical examination revealed no postural abnormalities and back muscles appeared normal. The range-of-motion (ROM) showed flexion to 50 degrees, extension to 19 degrees; right lateral flexion to 14 degrees, left lateral flexion to 16 degrees and left and right rotation was 0 degrees on both sides. Testing was conducted with consideration of pain, fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance, incoordination and was altered by repetition. ROM was painful on both sides with flexion and extension. The CI reported shooting pain from the left buttock to the bottom of the left leg and pain in the back of the left leg when bending toes or lifting the ball of his foot with the majority of pain in the calf area. There was minimal atrophy of the left calf. The Achilles and the patellar reflexes were absent in the left leg. Left knee flexion was 60 percent with zero percent extension. Testing was conducted with consideration of pain, fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance, incoordination, and was altered by repetition. The examiner rendered a diagnosis of S1 nerve root impingement s/p laminectomy.
The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the left S1 radiculopathy secondary to L5-S1 disk herniation status-post left L5 hemilaminectomy and L5-S1 micro-diskectomy condition as unfitting with a disability rating of 10% coded 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome). The VA rated the post-surgical S1 nerve root impingement with radiculopathy and weakness of the left leg and foot at 20%, coded 5293-8520 (intervertebral disc syndrome-incomplete paralysis of the sciatic nerve). The VA also rated that painful limited motion coded 5293-5292, rated at 20%. The Board considered whether criteria for a higher than the PEB 10% rating had been met under VASRD codes 5293 (intervertebral disc disease) or 8520 (incomplete paralysis of the sciatic nerve). There was evidence of radiculopathy on multiple examinations by both the PEB and the VA. The PEB noted a moderate loss of ROM of the lower back. The CI had abnormal strength, sensation and an absent deep tendon reflex in his left lower extremity. The commander’s statement indicated he had not been able to report for work since his original surgery date. The Board determined that his radicular pain and neurological deficits rose to the moderate level consistent with a 20% disability under VASRD code 8520. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5293-8520 for the left S1 radiculopathy condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left S1 radiculopathy condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5293-8520 IAW VASRD §4.124.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Left S1 radiculopathy Condition 5293-8520 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140501, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:
         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-01909.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities. Accordingly, the Board recommended modification of your assigned disability rating without re-characterization of your separation with severance pay.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. The office responsible for making the correction will inform you when your records have been changed.

                                                               Sincerely,






 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachments:
1. Directive
2. Record of Proceedings

cc:
SAF/MRBR
DFAS-IN

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01046

    Original file (PD 2014 01046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board unanimously agreed the record referenced above supported a rating of 10% for the back condition for reduced ROM of 80 degrees coded 5243 (disc syndrome) on examinations proximate to separation. The Board found no other appropriate codes for considerationfor the back condition.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the back condition.In summary the Board recommends a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01806

    Original file (PD2012 01806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “L5-S1 radiculopathy with EMG evidence of active denervation and mild abnormality of the right peroneal nerve”as unfitting, rated 20%, citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The MEB NARSUM diagnosis was L5-S1 radiculopathy with active denervation (on EMG) due to degenerative disc and joint disease of the lumbar spine.The neurology...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00218

    Original file (PD2009-00218.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The condition was determined to be medically unacceptable and the CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued military service, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. Additional 5 degrees loss ROM with repeated motion; 5/5 motor; negative straight leg raise; decrease in sensation to pinprick and light touch on left leg and great...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01425

    Original file (PD-2013-01425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Anesthesia consult pain clinic.”The CI underwent back surgery on 20 December 2002, 4 months after separation to decompress the left S1 nerve root. The CI noted constant lower back and “radicular pain of the left lower extremity extending to the foot, as well as paresthesias of the left foot only with stress,” the NARSUM noted some motor weakness in the left quadriceps (L4-5) and the neurosurgical note of 20 December 2002 stated “intractable left lower extremity pain” as the basis for going...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00079

    Original file (PD2013 00079.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Approximately a year prior to separation, 23 March 2001,orthopedic consult recorded a normal gait, normal reflexes, and normal motor exam; the CI indicated his pain and sensory symptoms had not significantly improved with treatment and requested surgery. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) evaluation, 20 June 2001, approximately 8 months prior to separationand 2 months status post (s/p) back surgery, indicated the CI was attending physical therapy and continued to report back pain. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01750

    Original file (PD2012 01750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA assigned a40% rating for the back condition rated 5292-5293 citing severe limitation of motion of the lumbar spine. The discussed the C&P examination report that the CI held on a chair and compared that examination with prior examinations and concluded the examination confirmed characteristic pain on motion but did not evidence muscle spasm.The Board also considered if additional disability rating was justified for peripheral nerve impairment due to radiculopathy.Although there was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00525

    Original file (PD2009-00525.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: ‘VA rated disability at 40% Service connection on May 28, 1997 and considered me unemployable on 4-22-04 for the back condition military discharged me with at 10%. Follow-up for back pain. The frequency and severity of the CI’s back pain and radicular pain increased significantly during his time on TDRL and this was consistent with the increasing severity of degenerative disc disease and herniated discs with impingement on the right S1 nerve root documented...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00105

    Original file (PD2009-00105.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The other three conditions were adjudicated as not unfitting and the CI was medically separated with a combined disability rating of 20%. Since combining the PEB’s two 10% ratings into a single 20% rating would be of no total benefit to the CI, the Board sees no reason for recommending this coding option. He also states that the majority of his discomfort is back pain related and not related to leg pain.’ The VA rating examiner documented a normal motor examination but did not detail a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02022

    Original file (PD-2013-02022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated LLE radiculopathy and low back pain (LBP) as unfitting rated at 20% and 10% respectively. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB’s adjudication for the left leg radiculopathy condition upon entry into TDRL.With regards to the permanent rating recommendation,Board members considered and agreed that during TDRL, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00725

    Original file (PD2009-00725.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the MEB exam on 5 June 2002 five months prior to separation the CI still complained of occasional back pain, some pain in his left foot, occasional left leg pain, and left lower leg numbness. In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5299-5295, IAW VASRD 4.71a. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability...